HEALTH CARE

The American Medical Association has weighed in on the new health care package.

The Allergists were in favor of scratching it, but the Dermatologists advised not to make any rash moves.

The Gastroenterologists had sort of a gut feeling about it, but the Neurologists thought the Administration had a lot of nerve.

Meanwhile, Obstetricians felt certain everyone was laboring under a misconception, while the Ophthalmologists considered the idea shortsighted.

Pathologists yelled, “Over my dead body!” while the Pediatricians said, “Oh, grow up!”

The Psychiatrists thought the whole idea was madness, while the Radiologists could see right through it.

Surgeons decided to wash their hands of the whole thing and the Internists claimed it would indeed be a bitter pill to swallow.

The Plastic Surgeons opined that this proposal would “put a whole new face on the matter”.

The Podiatrists thought it was a step forward, but the Urologists were pissed off at the whole idea.

Anesthesiologists thought the whole idea was a gas, and those lofty Cardiologists didn’t have the heart to say no.

In the end, the Proctologists won out, leaving the entire decision up to the @ssholes in Washington.

Got this from an email and posted here for a laugh later.

11 Habits of Highly In-effective Boss

1. Being a Know-It-All
Weak bosses quash discussions that might reveal their ignorance, belittle the true expertise in the group, and then (often without being aware of it) recruit and retain second-rate “stupider than moi” employees.

Strong bosses surround themselves with the smartest and most talented people they can hire. Rather competing to see who’s a bigger brainiac, they draw on the expertise of the entire group in order to make better-informed decisions.

2. Managing Numbers, Not People
Weak bosses spend more time with their spreadsheets than with their employees. While they give lip service to employee morale, they’re all about the bottom line–even if it means making everybody miserable.

Strong bosses see the numbers not as a reason for for managing employees but as a measure of how well those employees are managed. These bosses consider coaching to be top priority and trust that investing in people will cause the numbers to improve.

4. Spying on Employees
Weak bosses secretly believe that “the only people who like change are wet babies.” Since the status quo put them in power, the status quo (by definition) must be the best of all possible worlds. After all, “if ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”

Strong bosses don’t value change for its own sake, but they do recognize that both teams and individuals must swiftly adapt when the situation changes. While this might sometimes put the boss’s power base at risk, it’s a risk that they’re willing to take.

3. Embracing the Status Quo
Weak bosses feel the need to control employee behavior. They consequently monitor web traffic, social networking, emails and messages, all the while expecting to discover disloyal behavior. Some even use GPS to track employee movements.

Strong bosses realize that corporate snooping is not only pointless (because any half-wit can avoid it) but creates an atmosphere of paranoia that drives employees to become even more secretive.

5. Believing the Technology Myth
Weak bosses swallow the malarkey (endlessly promoted in high-tech ads) that computer technology automatically makes employees more productive. They’re thus ready to shell out big bucks … even when the last three IT projects died on the vine.

Strong bosses are well aware that new technology can eat up resources without providing much benefit. They are skeptical about which technologies to embrace, and they encourage their employees to be selective when deciding what to use.

6. ‘Divide & Conquer’
Weak bosses pit individuals and teams against one another other, hoping that competition will spur everyone on. These internal conflicts tend to create work environments that are seething swamps of resentment and pique.

Strong bosses discourage internal competition in favor of external competition. They encourage employees to see rival firms, not the guys down the hall, as the ones that deserve a good drubbing.

7. Refusing to Delegate
Weak bosses believe that delegating makes them less important. They therefore cling to their authority, relinquish it with great reluctance, and then micromanage the results, hoping (secretly) that the employees will conclude that the boss is essential.

Strong bosses know that delegating makes them more important. They realize that there’s a limited amount of time in each day and every hour spent doing something an employee could do is just an hour wasted.

8. Expecting Employees to Read Your Mind
Weak bosses believe employees will stay on their toes if they never know exactly what the boss is thinking. When such bosses provide feedback, its something like: “Nope, that’s not it!” or “Back to the drawing board!”

Strong bosses are explicit and specific about what they want and what needs to happen. They explain exactly how every project will be measured, and intervene only when those measurements show the project is going awry.

9. Refusing to Commit
Weak bosses are afraid to take a stand. If asked for an opinion, they’ll say: “That depends.” If asked for a decision, they’ll say “I have it under consideration” or (if they’re feeling frisky) “I have it under active consideration.”

Strong bosses realize that delaying a decision is, in itself, a decision—and usually it’s the decision to fail. They therefore make decisions quickly, without expecting or requiring exhaustive analysis and debate.

10. Ignoring Non-Performers
Weak bosses hope against hope that an employee who can’t do the job will somehow manage to soldier through. Meanwhile, as everyone else on the team has to pull a little harder to drag the deadweight along, resentment builds and morale suffers.

Strong bosses understand that when a job isn’t right for a particular individual, and it’s clear that further training or coaching won’t change things, it’s better to cut that employee loose, so that he or she can find a better match.

11. Stealing Credit
Weak bosses find a parade and get out in front of it. They jump in at the end of a project, add a little bit of “management input,” and then stick their name at the top of the victory presentation. If the project fails, though, the team “acted without my knowledge.”

Strong bosses give their employees the credit for doing the actual work, secure in the knowledge that bosses contribute in subtle but essential ways: resolving conflicts, coaching individuals, and providing perspective. And they take the heat when things go wrong.

I forgot where this list came from. I posted for my own referencing later.

The $50 Lesson

Recently, while I was working in the flower beds in the front yard, my neighbors stopped to chat as they returned home from walking their dog. During our friendly conversation, I asked their 12 year old daughter what she wanted to be when she grows up. She said she wanted to be President some day.

Both of her parents – liberal Democrats – were standing there, so I asked her, “If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?”
She replied, “I’d give food and houses to all the homeless people.”
Her parents beamed with pride!
“Wow…what a worthy goal!” I said. “But you don’t have to wait until you’re President to do that!” I told her.
“What do you mean?” she replied.
So I told her, “You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and trim my hedge, and I’ll pay you $50. Then you can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house.”
She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, “Why doesn’t the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?”
I said, “Welcome to the Republican Party.”

Her parents aren’t speaking to me any more.

 Got it from an email. Posted here for a smile later.

Interesting Statistics

There are actually two messages here.  The first one points out the incredible benefits of Universal Healthcare and is very interesting. The second is absolutely astonishing – and explains a lot.

1. A recent “Investor’s Business Daily” article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

Percentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
U.S.          65%
England   46%
Canada    42%

Percentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:
U.S.         93%
England  15%
Canada    43%

Percentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
U.S.         90%
England   15%
Canada    43%

Percentage referred to a medical specialist who sees one within one month:
U.S.          77%
England   40%
Canada     43%

Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
U.S.        71
England  14
Canada    18

Percentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in “excellent health”:
U..S.         12%
England    02%
Canada     06%

Check this last set of statistics!!

2. The percentage of each past president’s cabinet who had worked in the private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. 

Here are the percentages:
T. Roosevelt……………..    38%
Taft………………………..    40%
Wilson…………………….    52%
Harding……………………    49%
Coolidge…………………..48%
Hoover ……………………    42%
F. Roosevelt……………..    50%
Truman……………………    50%
Johnson…………………..    47%
Nixon………………………    53%
Ford………………………..    42%
Carter……………………..    32%
Reagan……………………    86%
GH Bush…………………..    51%
Clinton ……………………    39%
GW Bush………………….    55%

And the winner is:

Obama ……………………    08%

This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration: only 8% of them have ever worked in a job not supported by tax money! That’s right!  Only eight percent — the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!  And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?  They know what’s best for GM, Chrysler, Wall Street, and you and me? How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he’s never worked for one?  Or about jobs when he has never really had one?  And when it’s the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers?  They’ve spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as “community organizers.” They should have been in an employment line.

Pass this on!  We’ll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media.

“One of the penalties of not participating in politics is that you will be governed by your inferiors.” Plato

Got from an email. Post here for reference later.